Well - the phantom maker I can see, which is an improvement as it was sent to me because I had derived a structure from what I couldn't see on LION (Jan 2018) that had to have made the marks observed, then from structures I couldn't see that had to have made marks on Hutchison MFMP "Fracture" Sample (Feb 2020) and then actual structures on the VEGA Valley Eastern Plateau (April 2022) that matched the 'phantoms' that had to have caused the previous observations. So, from things I couldn't see, ghosts in the mechanics, I derived the things that were doing the work, and as soon as I see them in the flesh and share the work product, I get back a piece of engineering that might just be able to make the phantoms I had been investigating.
I like to work with what I can see. I am also far from perfect, just doing what I can. I will be wrong, I have been in the past, probably am now and likely will be in the future.
I don't care when I am wrong, I only care if I am right, and since nature can only tell the truth, it is the best thing to follow. I only started making real progress when I chose to focus on what nature was trying to say. Hopefully, from time to time, I will be equipped to understand its message rather than misunderstand it.
Baron, this is a very good book. Your basic premise is that there is space outside of the hole and counterspace inside of the hole. There is also a surface that I believe is mass due to the space and counterspace having different densities or viscosities leading to the stoppage of one particle or wave being able to travel through another particle or wave. Your theory also delves into metaphysics with geometry of the hole producing different particles. My theories equations use geometric, electrical, and the number of surface atoms for a material to calculate a phenomenon in the universe. Your particles have an electric and magnetic description as mine does. The electric field is related to the magnetic field.
Well - the phantom maker I can see, which is an improvement as it was sent to me because I had derived a structure from what I couldn't see on LION (Jan 2018) that had to have made the marks observed, then from structures I couldn't see that had to have made marks on Hutchison MFMP "Fracture" Sample (Feb 2020) and then actual structures on the VEGA Valley Eastern Plateau (April 2022) that matched the 'phantoms' that had to have caused the previous observations. So, from things I couldn't see, ghosts in the mechanics, I derived the things that were doing the work, and as soon as I see them in the flesh and share the work product, I get back a piece of engineering that might just be able to make the phantoms I had been investigating.
I like to work with what I can see. I am also far from perfect, just doing what I can. I will be wrong, I have been in the past, probably am now and likely will be in the future.
I don't care when I am wrong, I only care if I am right, and since nature can only tell the truth, it is the best thing to follow. I only started making real progress when I chose to focus on what nature was trying to say. Hopefully, from time to time, I will be equipped to understand its message rather than misunderstand it.
Baron,
Please take a look at my most recent posts on my Facebook page about how an airplane and a UAP create lift and propulsion.
Everything matches correctly.
https://www.facebook.com/rick.muller.7146/
Sincerely,
Rick
Baron, this is a very good book. Your basic premise is that there is space outside of the hole and counterspace inside of the hole. There is also a surface that I believe is mass due to the space and counterspace having different densities or viscosities leading to the stoppage of one particle or wave being able to travel through another particle or wave. Your theory also delves into metaphysics with geometry of the hole producing different particles. My theories equations use geometric, electrical, and the number of surface atoms for a material to calculate a phenomenon in the universe. Your particles have an electric and magnetic description as mine does. The electric field is related to the magnetic field.