The Holonomy & Geometry of The Space-Time Vacuum

As inferred by electrodynamics, plasmoid physics, platonism, and other sources

NOTICE: THIS DOCUMENT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

PLEASE SUPPORT BOB GREENYER, REMOTE VIEW & THE M.F.M.P.

I doubt I would be writing this post, or even this book at all, if it wasn't for his commitment, dedication, infectious excitement, and excellence in scientific pursuit. It was Bob who showed me that the science still lives, who inspired me to start writing, and again who nudged me onto substack. I am merely a spectator with a compulsion to categorize & stratify complex systems. Bob is the real scientist & expert here. I should point out that I technically have no qualifications for scientific endeavour: I am merely passionately curious.

If you like what I have to say, please support the MFMP & Greenyer at his substack entitled 'Remote View' here: https://remoteview.substack.com

⇐ Previous: Secrets of The Sacred Trinities: When Science Found The Holy Ghost

The Geometry of Space-Time

I've prepared this brief synopsis of The Geometry of Space-Time: A main subject in my upcoming trilogy book set.

The upcoming set, The Arcaneum: A Call From The Void, is written in the style of natural philosophy, emphasizing qualitative geometric or abstract, logical explanations over mathematical quantizations or proofs, while still attempting to be informed by and adhere to the fruits of empiricism, not a small part of which is Bob's work.

One of those subjects therein is the synthesis & theory of a geometric model of space-time, mainly derived from electrodynamics and plasmoid physics, but also accounting for and maintaining compliance with:

• Particle physics

• Relativity

• Electrodynamics

• Counterspace

• Neoplatonism

• Metaphysics

• Various Cosmologies

Prerequisite, Recommended Reading

If the contents of this document is flabbergasting, please review the following documents, especially, E.P. Dollard, first. In particular:

• Video: The History & Theory of Electricity by E.P. Dollard.

• Video: The Origins of Energy Synthesis by E.P. Dollard.

• Text: The Symbolic Representation of the Generalized Electric Wave, as written by E.P. Dollard.

• Text: Space & Counterspace: A New Science of Gravity, Time and Light, as written by Nick Thomas.

• Text: Space-Vortex Theory, as written by Paramahamsa Tewari.

Concerning Wave vs Particle Models

Some attempts, notably those of P. Tewari & J. Yee attempt to reconcile the particle & wave duality or dichotomy, seemingly successfully, and I do believe both these mathematical models work out extremely accurately to the empirical measurements coming out of quantum & nuclear fields. More yet, they may be characteristically compatible or analogous.

Concerning Jeff Yee’s mathematical model EWT, im pretty sure he’s reproduced all of the quantum constants using only classical newtonian mechanics, to a high degree of accuracy, many decimal places.

Concerning Electrodynamics & Science

A schism has existed between the electrodynamic and scientific schools of thought, rooted in the wave-particle duality controvery, and beginning with Tesla and JJ. Thomson, whose beliefs precluded the ideas of electrons and photons as particles. Despite Thomson being credited with discovering the electron, he insisted them to be fields over particles.

This thread runs deep and extends far, with even Ken Wheeler still today insisting photons don't exist, or he would have to 'shake out his camera' after photography.

Ken does provide a number of suitably scientific reasons as well, such as the re-acceleration of light leaving mediums causal to electromagnetic retardation: if light really is a particle, then it's breaking conservation upon when it leaves the medium and re-accelerates without an external force.

And he connects this back to photography, relating to lens-doping with electromagnetic retardants to correct for chromatic aberration.

And as such, this philosophy of electrodynamics that I have developed is perhaps most significant to the school of electrodynamic thought, and not to empirical science, having remedied this century-long ongoing schism of the consideration of particles, not as 'wrong' but as electrodynamic singularities caused by non-linear optic's implied curvature in non-linearity.

And in this sense, and in my view,electrons may be conceived as packets of space-time containing energy that by virtue of that energy, self-distort their local space-time to be slightly hyperbolic, to cause an impression perceived as a particle.

Non-linear optics perhaps speaks to effects of the phantom as well, through the concepts of optical vortices and topological charge, relating to the incident angle of the vortex, in essence.

Understanding Counterspace

There are several things which it can be accurately said that "Counterspace", is:

• A space containing only energy.

• A geometric concept.

• A geometric transformation.

• A philosophy.

In electrodynamics generally speaking, counterspace is found inside atoms, and space is found outside atoms, and this definition was stated by Oliver Heaviside. Then-since, however, multiple examples of counterspatial phenomena have been observed & documented in other places & contexts, such as under-unity & over-unity electrical devices, EVOs and micro-wormholes.

Breaking down the concept of Counterspace into the simpest terms,

• Conceptually, Counterspace is a non-physical non-euclidian “negative” or “inverted” space containing energy that exists in superposition with space as we know it, however the interface between the two spaces is not uniformly distributed nor static in its topology.

  • Due to this, some people, such as Ken Wheeler, have said that Counterspace is both everywhere and nowhere at the same time.

• Definitionally, Counterspace is the polar opposite of euclidian space.

• Electrodynamically, Counterspace is where electric field go when they shrinks to a point or disappear.

• Physically, Counterspace is where wormholes pass through, and is described by hyperbolic mathematics.

• Geometrically, Counterspace is a polar inversion from outward to inward infinity.

• Dimensionally, Counterspace is the source, origin & cause of all non-unity, non-causal & non-local phenomena.

• Empirically, Counterspace may manifest in space as planck-scale longitudinal flux vortices between particles, creating what has been called quantum entanglements, and being for practical purposes, an atemporal micro-wormhole connecting those entangled particles.

However this consideration of counterspace will be inadequate for some applications, and should be considered only as a guideline.

Concerning My Approach

It should be noted that I am operating within an electrodynamic worldview instead of quantum or standard-model worldview. This means, a wave-based model of the universe, not particles. However, there is some wiggle-room.

Some models view particles as abstractions of wave systems, perhaps solitons, or other vortical structures, such as that posited by Descartes.

However, the utilization of counterspace in consideration of the structure of particles, or what I believe should be called vacuum engineering is to my knowledge unprecedented, and this greatly aids in this pursuit, has not yet been done, and that is what my work is about.

Counterspace is a well-establshed reality in electrodynamic circles, its existence is intrinsically proven in many of the technologies underlying the electric devices that we know, use, and love.

P. Tewari’s Vacuum model views particles as ‘holes in space’ or voids caused by the breakdown of dynamic vacuum, and my model is derived from this. The difference in my model is that instead of space breaking down into a hole, it undergoes geometric transformation into counterspace, meaning the holonomy or curvature of the space changes, from euclidian to hyperbolic, creating the singularity or particle.

This flows naturally from Tewari’s model on the basis of the dielectric field tending towards infinity at the particle’s surface in both models.

In my model however, this infinity is an artifact of the inversion & reflection of the dielectric field at the event horizon of the particle’s surface, and the atom’s interior is not void, but is instead a negative image of everything that was previously outside of the atom.

This interpretation is following from the work of Nick Thomas originally laid down in concept by Rudolf Steiner, which is known to have held significance to Steinmetz. And this is also why counterspace is considered inherently non-locally connected.

This interpretation is incidentally compliant with Plotinus’ concept of the Platonic Forms in Hypostases, or the ‘Mirror World’, where matter is projected into space from within, in negative, and the Platonic Forms are essentially the dielectric field.

So moving forward, please be aware we are working somewhat outside the bounds of the academic mainstream, but we are doing so cautiously and in an informed, insightful manner.

Concerning Steinmetz’ Electrodynamics

The old-world electrodynamics of C.P. Steinmetz & O. Heaviside developed & utilized at the dawn of the electrical age used a different system & nomenclature of electrical engineering than is used today.

For example, an electric field to Steinmetz is called an electromagnetic field today, and this has been known to cause issues in transliteration, for those unfamiliar.

His approach was more robust, more complex, and was dependent on the concept of counterspace or negative space to address inversions inherent to the conjugate relationship between dielectricity & magnetism, such as the opposing phase biases or opposing convergent & divergent field topologies.

This was once used by the American Association of Electrical Engineers. It has been argued by Ken Wheeler, Eric Dollard & many others that the state of electrical science today has retrograded due to the (faulty) assumptions of particle physics & relativity.

In Steinmetz’ reckoning, Heaviside's "Theory of Continuity of Energy" supplants "Theory of Conservation of Energy" to account for phase shifts and trapped fluxes (in general, "Counterspace” ).

In Steinmetz’ reckoning, unlike the currently used "fluid flow" model of electricity, the current flows outside, not inside the wires, which is technically inaccurate as the Veritasium drama recently showed. Dollard did make a response to that, professing the Steinmetzian interpetation, for those unfamilar, this is likely a good starting point.

Steinmetz’ electrodynamic conception is summarized by Dollard as saying, there are:

• Waves moving forwards in time

• Waves moving backwards in time

• Waves moving in space

• Waves moving in counterspace

Technical Electrodynamic Counterspace

Technically, counterspace means using two spaces instead of one, adding a polar counterspace in addition to euclidian space, with the hyperbolic electric field as the intermediary. In the world of electrodynamics, counterspace is a necessary ingredient, required for explaining many phenomena:

• Counterspace is implied by Steinmetz’ inverse units such as Ohms vs Mhos, leading to:

  • The increasing capacitance / energy storage of capacitors as the space between the plates decreases, opposite behavior to that of inductors.

  • The increasing energy of light waves as the wavelength & volume decreases.

  • As above, capacitance / counterspace loosely describes energy convergence or condensation, whereas inductance / space loosely describes energy divergence and the inverse-square law.

  • In old-world electrodynamics, capacitors are even called condensors, and i feel there is a relation here to the concept of condensation as it applies to EVOs, related to Bob’s ‘pinch’.

  • In particular, i believe the phenomena of condensation may be described electrodynamically as induced hyperbolic curvature in the space-time medium, leading to convergence.

• As stated by Heaviside, “The perfect conductor is a perfect obstructor”, relating to the reflection of flux along the exterior of wires, like a pebble skipping along the surface of water, and not flowing through the interior.

  • The behavior of quantum levitation, as explained electrodynamically, is the inability of the electric lines of force to penetrate into the nuclei of supercooled media, following from the above.

• The behavior of trapped fluxes.

• The observations of over & under unity, whose occurrence is caused by “synchronous parameter variation”, as explained mathematically by Steinmetz, which invokes the behavior of transience to break symmetry.

• The category of non-hertzian waves, being the existence of one-wire power transmission, colloquially called impulse currents, or longitudinal waves, or magnetodielectric waves, ‘cold electricity’ as demonstrated by Tesla’s hairpin circuit. **Dollard, Lindemann & Borderland Science foundation have filmed demonstrations as proof of these phenomena. And theres many more on YouTube. Tesla viewed this as bypassing the electromagnetic medium and interacting directly with the neutral particle flux.

• I’ll also mention here that Dollard has glanced upon some EVO phenomena, including an experimental Farnsworth tube that ‘stayed turned on, after the power was switched off’, demonstrating the phantom.

• There’s video of Dollard demonstrating the attraction of non-metals (if i remember correctly) to special tubes using cold-electricity as described above, analogous perhaps to vacuum or hutchison forces or processes.

• In the consideration of phase conjugation as described by NLO, Bearden, Winter & others, Dollard has, unknowingly, expressed this phenomena in Steinmetz nomenclature within the description of the functionality of the Bolinas experimental broadcast laboratory, which used magnetodielectrics as opposed to electromagnetics. I believe this was a macro-scaled time-reversal or phase-conjugate antenna, essentially.

  • It was phrased as “cross-cancellation” instead of phase conjugation, resulting in broadcast of tunable velocity upon a spectrum from C to instantaneous. And herein is an electrodynamic relation to entanglement, non-causal & non-local phenomena, perhaps time-reversal, etc, using counterspace as the intermediary.

  • Brute-force methods were used to achieve this, namely immense grounding networks resulting in nigh-zero impedance (superconductivity) to ground, a requirement to manifesting these non-maxwellian electrodyamic phenomena.

  • Other features were also used, including a 90’ phase asymmetry between the poles of the antenna to exploit the characteristics of the electrodynamic quadrature in order to prevent the transfiguration between dielectric & magnetic energy storage.

  • And also phase-correction within the antenna network itself to render the electric qualities across the width of each pole of the antenna to be scalar, simulating a point-like behavior.

  • The antenna’s power was supplied at the lateral edges and moved inwards, only to meet in the center and ‘cross-cancel’, with a phase disparity, apparently producing the effect.

The tricky thing here is that, counterspace is NOT the inside of the atoms, but rather a condition which happens to exist inside them, but can be replicated elsewhere.

Fractal Woman, Ken Wheeler, Eric Dollard are the only viable sources for this material as far as I know. It’s mentioned in brief by others. Dollard has one extensive work here, and is probably the authority. I think he, or someone like him if there even is anyone else, needs to be looking at this, and the plasmoid/EVO landscape.

It may well be that counterspace and the electromagnetic phantom are synonymous, or analogous. It’s really looking that way. Dollard has anecdotally speculated the existence of “A third electrodynamic force” based on observations of coils crushed inwards, which is not consistent with either the electromotive or magnetomotive forces… I think this is the phantom. If the phantom is found to have a self-contracting nature ( think: gravitational self-collapse or collapse of electron-shells to the nucleus, was that Matsumoto? ) then I would say the deal is sealed.

Defining Vacuum Engineering

In my view, space-time engineering, vacuum engineering, and counterspace engineering would all be the same thing.

To define the term vacuum engineering, I believe its definition should be this:

The category of the manipulation of the space-time medium in order to enable:

● Non-local engineering (NLE)
Non-local engineering is defined as the use of vacuum force to break locality laws.
● Non-causal engineering (NCE)
Non-causal engineering is defined as the use of vacuum force to break causality laws.
● Non-unity engineering (NUE)
Non-unity engineering is defined as the creation, transmutation or destruction of energy.
● Changes in absolute quanta (CAQ)
Changes in absolute quanta is defined as the creation, transmutation or destruction of matter.

* It should be noted that in many cases, the above categories of engineering are interdependent an interrelated, due to entropy laws.

In my view, the key to vacuum engineering of non-local, non-causal & non-unity technologies is the bending of this rule, and manifesting counterspace or hyperbolic space-time curvature, or non-linearity in other contexts than within the atoms.

Examples of vacuum engineering may include:

• EVOs (All?)

• Nuclear physics (CAQ)

• Wormholes (NLE)

• Subatomic particles (CAQ)

• Entanglement (NLE)

• Exotic energy technologies (NUE)

• Matter & energy synthesis or desynthesis (CAQ)

• Warp propulsion, (NCE)

• Time-reversal / Phase Conjugation (NCE)

• Time-cameras (NCE)

• Superluminal waves (NCE)

And in my view, all of these phenomena operate via counterspace, and cannot be properly understood or engineered without it.

In the past, connections have been drawn between the fractal Yin-Yang patterns, and observations in plasmoid physics.

In my view, the significance of the Yin-Yang patterns indicates the balance or ratios between these to spaces, and viewing them as such may be key to unlocking the ability to engineer the vacuum. An experimental model will be presented herein.

It is my belief that EVOs exist as the intersection in space of 3 disparate electrodynamic forces, two of which are known:

• Dielectricity

• Magnetism

And the third of which is currently in the process of being (re)discovered:

• Vacuum, gravity, or the electromagnetic phantom.

Connecting Counterspace to Physics

My model is using P. Tewari’s Vacuum Model, with the additon of Counterspace, to render it compliant with all known & observed phenomena.

Dollard has called the electrodynamic worldview "The Theory of Anti-Relativity" though this may be a misnomer. Poincare’s reckoning of relativity preserved the conceptions of aether significantly moreso than Einstein’s, so the two may not actually be as mutually exclusive as suggested.

Before relativity, this was the predominant model, correlated with the zeitgeist of the dawn of the electric age and likely linked to the fame & celebrity of Steinmetz at the time. Even Einstein was eager to have his picture taken with the man, for perspective.

Other authors have tried bridging the electrodynamic worldview & model to modern empirical measurement & models, with varying success. I’d happily cite Jeff Yee’s Energy-Wave Theory here, P. Tewari’s Space-Vortex (Vacuum) Theory, and perhaps I will (ambivalently) mention Dan Winter Fractal field theory here, due to his nebulous & uncertain credibility & proximity to New-Age-ism, which we clearly want to avoid. I mean, Dan’s fractal field topologically similar to Zhvirblis’ phantom, for certain. They’re both fractal fields, in essence.

The problem with quantum theory is that shape is fundamental to the universe, and even moreso to promote human understanding & comprehension. The shapes in nature all seem to imply golden proportions, in cascading multitudes, usually resulting in spirals or derivatives thereof. The phantom must be the underlying cause of this.

The Missing Pieces

This model is not complete as it lacks mathematical verification, however it is based on a plethora of observational data. Of course, electrodynamics uses quaternion tensors, being 4D vector fields, when not using Heaviside's algebraic or Steinmetz' symbolic geometric systems, which are the phasors & versors.

Whether my interpretation is mathematically derivable from the Lorentz transformations or not is still unknown, it needs investigation. My suspicion is that they can be made analogous, but this needs verification. I think Jeff Yee should look at this, he’s (very) good with numbers.

Until I find someone to tackle the math on this, I'm quite happy to continue operating within the electrodynamic worldview, and not worry about how mathematically congruent this may be to standard models.

And more yet it seems projective geometry needs to be employed for a fully working end-to-end mathematical model, as implied by Nick Thomas' work, which I might recommend to you as a lens for a expanded perspective on EVOs.

The Holonomic Model of Space-Time Geometry

Thus far has been only forewords and acknowledgements, so onto my theory….

I think "space-time" isn't a duality as the compound-word suggests, it's better reflected as a quadrature, "space - time - counterspace - antitime" which may be supplemented and simplified as "space - magnetism - vacuum - dielectric" for reasons explained in my book:

On the above rendering:

• The interface of space & time is located at the north,
  (Heaven / Yang in Ba Gua, the physical world)

• The interface of counterspace & time is at the west.
  (This would be consciousness)

• Magnetism is positioned in-between them.

Observationally speaking, this does seem to be significant:

• Space is forward-phased from consciousness in time:
  Is this why we perceive space through time moving forwards?

• Magnetism exists between consciousness & space:
  Is this why dipole repulsion is responsible for all structure & volume in the physical world? ( Which goes away when in coherence, Bob’s coherent matter waves… )

This was derived from the characteristics of the electrodynamic cycle, where dielectric condenses with forward phase and magnetism diverges with negative phase:

The above was derived from Dollard’s Symbolic Representation of the Generalized electric wave:

Which was itself derived from the mathematical works of C.P. Steinmetz, here rendered geometrically:

With this geometric conception of space-time, it then becomes possible to make direct comparisons, correlations & calculations using Steinmetz electrodynamics, to non-linear behaviors such as relativity, as well as to conceptualize them geometrically as a continuum of curvature.

Not to mention space-time is already essentially represented as a quadrature and shares, in essence, the same characteristics in many traditional systems:

1. The Medicine Wheel

2. The Wheel of Dharma or Samsara

3. The electrodynamic cycle itself, Steinmetz/Dollard reckoning.

4. The Kali Yuga

5. Prenatal Ba Gua I Ching (Taoist) which has near complete topological congruency to the AC cycle in Steinmetz reckoning, too much i think to be a coincidence.

6. Wheeler-Feynman Absorber theory, in that it shares the concept of temporal and anti-temporal contra-rotating wave components in superposition as a topological model of the elecric wave, this layout is also found in the Prenatal Ba Gua and Steinmetz electrodynamic model.

7. 15 of The Sacred Trinities ( by applying platonic dimensional divisions, 3 becomes 4 geometrically, somewhat related to Pythagoras’ Tetractys, though loosely, and akin to exponentiation in some definitions. )

8. Primordial Cosmology from Greek Mythology.

That's an awful lot of datapoints to be congruent as a matter of mere coincidence.

Steinmetz takes it further yet, by breaking the quadrature down into superposition of transient (discontinuous) waves to represent continuous waves, finally to be represented as differentials of the 8th order, analogous to the 8 subdivisions of the Ba Gua & Kali Yuga & Wheel of Dharma, and perhaps a mathematical origin to them all. And perhaps even also related to the E-8 group, but I haven’t got there yet.

Is it coincidence that this pattern appears as the structure of the universal in nearly every spiritual tradition?

The Shapes of The Universe

As was originally identified by Bob Greenyer as the remarkable similarity between the below figures ( 2. Electron ) and ( 3. Proton ), the following extrapolation & interconnection of plasmoid physics to sacred symbolism was established. To be clear, there are likely many or even countless permutations of possible vacuum structures, however they may fall into the following arhetypal topologies:

These symbolic shapes occupy not just space, but also counterspace as well, as must any structures that interact with time, like particles do via their mass.

We consider the black areas as representing Heaven or Yang, and white areas as representing Earth or Yin, which we will show mythologically represents nature and its fractal underpinning: the electromagnetic phantom, or counterspace. From this, we may ultimately conclude the black as space, and white as counterspace, allowing us to make theoretical & mathematical connections between these symbols & physics.

The first shape is the universe itself, a closed hyperbolic spheroid containing within it the stars, constellations, and everything else material.

That leaves four remaining shapes: The subatomic particles.

And is there a reason this resembles the lobes of the empirical electron shell orbitals?

Extrapolations

PLEASE NOTE: Extrapolating further co-equal divisions of the above shown “Archetypal Topology” beyond the quintessence does result in infinite, nested alternations between radial & concentric divisions: exactly the same relationship between the electric & magnetic fields when nesting the electromagnetic phantom, the topology of the N-Torus. This would seem to indicate that the Archetypal Topology as defined by the Monadic traditions, particularly Plato through to Plotinus, is an accurate model of space-time, and the Greek philosophers knew what they were talking about.

Another way to look at this progression is as a geometric artifact of the loss of holonomy: In Counterspace, Yin & Yang are 180’ opposed. But in space, they are only 90’ opposed, and that’s because of the increased curvature in counterspace. This defines the ‘holographic’ or more accurately, holonomic character of the universe, and is the basis for the development of my Space-Time quadrature. This is also the relationship shown between the Prenatal & Postnatal Ba Gua I Ching topologies, as another clue.

Mythological Musings

In brief, Chaos becomes Gaia ( counterspace, dynamic vacuum, or nature ), there containing the other four:

• Nyx (electric)

• Erebus (magnetic)

• Tartarus (counterspace)

• Eros (space)

Above, as quadrature, and below as particles:

• Electron

• Proton

• Neutron

• Plasmoid

And each producing or being causal to:

• Energy

• Space

• Time

• Uncertainty / Consciousness

Another piece of the puzzle is the statement by Hesiod,

Gaia brought forth her equal Uranus (Heaven) to "cover her on every side”.

We know from the Taoist Ba Gua I Ching that heaven refers to the Yang in the cosmological context. From this we can infer that Gaia is equivalent to the Yin.

This is very evocative of the relationship between counterspace & space, being the inner & outer space, relative to the particle’s surface, which has in essence,

We can establish 3 primordial ‘layers’, if we are to presume this mythology originates in descriptiomedium.

1. Tartarus (inner)

2. Gaia (intermediate)

3. Uranus (outer)

Which does resemble the Trinity of Nihilism from Zen Buddhism:

1. Emptiness

2. Nothingness

3. Consciousness

We also know Gaia, lets say, was liberal in her selection of mates, having conjugated with:

• Uranus(Heaven),

• Pontus(Sea),

• Aether(Light),

• Tartarus(Pit/Void)

More on this later…

Consideration of Complexities

• Relativistic curvature is interpreted through the lens of non-linearity as well-defined in NLO (non-linear optics), and in my view curvature & non-linearity is a shift in the holonomy / topology of space caused by intensity & proximity of counterspace induced by the dielectric field, characterized by a geometric transformation towards hyperbolic curved space to account for the compressability of electric fields, relativistic dilations, etc

• The above is simplified as saying relativistic curvature results from fluctuations in the symmetry between space & counterspace, or electric & magnetic fields within & around the atom, which are fundamentally linked with a geometric transformation.

• Whether this interpetation is mathematically derivable from the Lorentz transformations or not is still unknown, it needs investigation....but, qualitatively, that electric compressability is why transmission lines use high voltage unlike distribution lines, and which Bob i think calls 'pinch' in his EVO model or at least relates to it in some way.

• Relating to counterspace in terms of space-time & LENR, nobel laureate Julian Schwinger's limit is the calculated threshold of empty-space non-linearity, and he left the american physical society over refusal to publish his LENR papers, back in the day, I only know of this anecdotally though so maybe Bob has more details as the resident LENR expert.

• I'd consider Schwinger's limit related to hyperbolic curvature and transition to counterspace, perhaps describing the threshold condition at the particle's surface where the transition between spaces is total. (in electrodynamics, space is outside the atom, and counterspace is inside the atom. I expand upon this with a working model of geometric transformation between those spaces)

• The above echoes of Paramahamsa Tewari's Vacuum model of the electron in Space-Vortex theory, a central pillar in my writing & conception, expanded upon as above.

• There's much more, I'm at about 500 pages. 108,000 words.

My Intentions

In some sense I'm writing a counterpoint or supplement to Bob's work, where his work is very empirical, taking a bottom-to-top or reductionist approach, my approach is more neoplatonic, apophatic (deobjectification) or monadic, essentially, top-to-bottom. As far as I can tell, Bob is right on the money and there is a lot of congruency.

One of the things I am trying to do is process, filter & distill some clarity, common-sense & falsifiability / verifiability out of the quite nebulous work of Dan Winter, who I find amusing, and occasionally profound, but likely a detrimental influence to the energy research community as he polarizes people, believers closer, and skeptics further away, where Bob does exactly the opposite.

---

Continue to the next article for the explanation of the physical mechanism behind the electromagnetic phantom. Find out how I believe it works, with a rational geometric explanation based upon Steinmetz’ understanding of Electrodynamics.

Read more in my next article here:

Next: The Electromagnetic Phantom as a Topology of Time ⇒